Showing posts with label Aliens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aliens. Show all posts

Monday, May 26, 2014

The Dyson Sphere - So Theoretical It May Already Exist



Europa is cool and all but if there’s one thing even I can attest to…
“Halo” is way cooler.
With that I give you the Dyson Sphere. It’s a technology so hypothetical that theoretically it could already exist. Is the concept not making any sense to you? No worries. It confused the hell out of me at first too.
Today at To Infinity and…In Theory we’re going to discuss a growing energy crisis, what a Dyson Sphere is, how it works, and how to look for something similar to this that may already exist.
Let’s start with the basics. What is a Dyson Sphere?

Technically They’re Stapledon Clouds…



Science Fiction has a tendency to become Science Fact someday. It seems it takes quite the eccentric of an imagination to dream up the advances of the future. The Warthog from Halo is one example. Da Vinci’s flying machines and Jules Verne’s submarine are others. But in 1937, a British author by the name of Olaf Stapledon wrote a colorful novel proposing theories of the universe that were not only unknown at the time, but by today’s knowledge, is mostly correct.
The most incredible of this were the unnamed objects surrounding the stars of super-intelligent quadrants of the universe. These “light-traps” gathered up all the energy supplied by the sun and utilized it for the super-intelligent beings to harness for their technological advancements. These “light-traps” are what we would probably refer to as solar arrays today. The arrangement around the sun gathering all the energy, that’s a different beast altogether.
Here’s the excerpt from his 1937 novel “Star Maker”:

"Not only was ever solar system now surrounded by a gauze of light traps, which focused the escaping solar energy for intelligent use, so that the whole galaxy was dimmed, but many stars that were not suited to be suns were disintegrated, and rifled of their prodigious stores of sub-atomic energy."

Considering the time period that’s some pretty advanced thinking. From that very clever description, when a young man in 1945 read Star Maker, it gave him a brilliant idea. He realized we were going about the search for intelligent life all wrong. If we wanted to find it, we’d need to let Olaf take us all to school.

The Unwanted Legacy of Freeman Dyson



While Olaf Stapledon’s wild imagination dreamed up the initial conceptualization of these hypothetical megastructures, a man named Freeman Dyson took the thought experiment one step further in his 1960 paper "Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infra-Red Radiation", published in the journal “Science”. He didn’t outline how we’d go about building one; he just focused on the most important aspect to him. Energy.
He hypothesized that eventually as a technological civilization advanced its need for energy increased exponentially as well. Look at the time from the middle ages to the industrial revolution. Horses and caravans gave way to steam engines and coal burners. Eventually these were replaced with petroleum, and now we even find ourselves searching for ways to get more energy than oil produces. Dyson certainly wasn’t wrong.
In a way he wished he had been though. In 2013 at a symposium Dyson was quoted as saying he wished he’d never been credited with the fanatical science fiction fantasy concept. Perhaps he wouldn’t have been if he’d have given Mr. Stapledon credit for his groundwork in the initial paper. Alas, he did not; he did however think things through very thoroughly.
He described these as a shell that would orbit the sun; the solar arrays would gather the energy and transmit 100% of its power back to the Earth for our consumption. It’s a brilliant concept but there are a million problems to overcome. First and foremost, there’s a little thing called gravity.
The gravitational pull of the sun is around 28 times stronger than what we experience on the Earth. Without finding a way to lock a satellite in place around the sun it would just be pulled into the star and burned to a crisp. Several different patterns have been proposed, from the Dyson Swarm, Bubble, and Sphere, all the way to an entire enclosure around the star that doubles as a habitat for the intelligent species. This is probably the least feasible but the others actually might not be too far from something golden.
Let’s break down this fiction into fact-tion.

Come Sail Away


Above we mentioned that in order for these satellites to gather energy from the sun directly they have to be able to counteract it’s incredibly strong gravitational forces. Amazingly enough, the concept has been around for hundreds of years. Let’s go back to the 1800s and visit a man named James Clerk Maxwell.
James Clerk Maxwell discovered what is often referred to as the second great unification of physics. Combining optics, electricity, and magnetism he discovered that these all had similar properties and worked in tandem with one another. In 1861 James Maxwell wrote his findings on electromagnetism.
An incredible mathematician, as well as a physicist, Maxwell came up with a series of 20 equations and 20 variables that were published in 1861 that proved electricity, magnetism, and light all played a role with one another, and all could be manipulated from pressures and were capable of providing momentum. Through this, by 1864, Maxwell had theoretically described the ability to use light pressure in order to sail.
That’s when an author by the name of Jules Verne took it a step further (as they so often do) and decided that using light pressure to sail the oceans was boring, but in space on the other hand, "there will someday appear velocities far greater than these [of the planets and the projectile], of which light or electricity will probably be the mechanical agent ... we shall one day travel to the moon, the planets, and the stars." This is often considered to be the first written account of using light sails for, well, sailing.
Well all of this was fine and dandy but there was a slight problem. While James Maxwell’s experiments and papers were very well thought out and conducted properly, he was limited by what he had available for equipment at the time. His theories were widely accepted, but they were still not considered by all as definitive. Then in 1899, a Russian scientist blew everyone away and would’ve made Maxwell very proud.
A man named Pytor Lebedev, a man without even a high school diploma, found himself pondering the thoughts of Johannes Kepler one day. In 1619, Kepler came up with a theory that radiation pressure had to exist in order to explain the way a comets tail always points away from the sun. As we know now, the tail of a comet is a mixture of ice particles, minerals, and various gases, which explains how radiation pressure is able to have an effect on it.


Using a device he created capable of producing light waves of 6mm and 4mm, and a Nichols radiometer he proved the existence of radiation pressure. Through this he also proved Maxwell’s theories. Experiments in following years would build upon this concept much further until the point where we reached the Solar Sail.
Flashing ahead to 1974 we’ll take a look at the Mariner 10 mission. This satellite mission was unique, not in the reason it was in orbit, but the understanding scientists got from some on-the-fly maneuvering. When the satellite’s stores of attitude control gas ran low and the risk of being dead in the water was becoming a very real threat, NASA control came up with a brilliant idea. By angling the solar panels at the sun at a precise angle they were able to use the minimal amount of radiation pressure exerted on this particular craft to create attitude control. Mariner 10 wasn’t designed for solar sailing, which by the 80s had led many scientists on the quest to replicate the events of Mariner 10, but more successfully.
The Russians attempted solar sailing missions throughout the 1990s with mixed success. The first one that went up into orbit unfurled and was able to beam solar energy back to the planet but it was unable to control itself in orbit and burned up in the atmosphere. In 1999 the successor to this mission failed to deploy properly and the Cosmonauts abandoned solar sailing.
The Japanese in the early part of this last decade deployed solar sail missions into space as well. In 2003, India also deployed solar sails as supplements to some of their spacecraft’s. It seems Photon Sails were all the rage. But there’s one problem, they haven’t technically been considered a success, because so far they haven’t technically worked…
While solar sails have yet to be used in space as a means of propulsion, NASA is hoping to change that by 2015. The SunJammer mission slated to launch then hopes to be the first successful attempt at using photons from the sun’s rays in order to gain momentum. Only time can tell if this will work out for us, but one thing is sure if it does, we’re one step closer to a Dyson Sphere.
So that’s just one problem. The next is weight. As we all know the more dense an object is, the stronger the effect that gravity has on it. This is apparent in the difference between a feather and an apple. If both are dropped from the same balcony the apple will most assuredly hit the ground first. Why? Because it’s heavier, it has more density. So how do we lower the effect of gravity on our solar sails?

Nanotech for Macro Problems



We’ve talked about the potential for using Multi-Walled and Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes here before at TI&IT (Nano-Tech: Big Problems, Small Answers) for applications in the medical field via cancer treatments. But we also talked about them having a multitude of applications. Well today we’re going to go from the terminal ward to the outer reaches of space. Turns out MWNTs (Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes) are going to be setting sail.
Nanotubes have some serious benefits. They’re light, durable, extremely tough, and very thin. This means a bulletproof vest that once weighed fifty pounds can now weigh less than eight ounces. To go further with this example, this means a glass and panel solar satellite that once weighed thousands of pounds is now capable of weighing as relatively little as an average human being.
In fact, some scientists predict that using MWNTs in the production of solar sails could lead us into the age of interstellar travel. Some estimate that the sails will be capable of reaching up to 5.6% the speed of light under the right conditions. Being that my mathematical background is rather limited, I’m not at liberty to discuss the complex equations leading to these discoveries, but I trust the community for the most part.
And the use of nanotubes doesn’t have to end in the construction of the sails. They can be used to craft the vessel attached to the sail as well. Solar sails don’t have many moving parts and using all natural propulsion offers a secondary group of long reaching advantages, the biggest of which being longer running time.
The last hurdle to really overcome is the ability to beam the light back to the Earth for us to use. However, major advances in solar technology have made this once significant issue far less of a problem. We’ll have to wait till 2015 to see if the solar sail works, but if it does, let’s take a look at some of the ways we can use this to create our hypothetical Dyson Sphere.

Swarms, Bubbles, and Shells


The first and possibly most complex of the three forms we’re going to talk about is the Swarm. The easiest way to accomplish this would be to make a ring (Think the Forerunner’s “Halo” in…ya know…”Halo”). To just make one single ring, while it would be the easiest pattern for astrophysicists and mathematicians to work with, it wouldn’t be the most energy efficient.
The one pictured above however would be a much more proficient form of a swarm. The problem with this nevertheless is that it involves extremely complex patterns of movement for each solar sail. At certain points the satellites will overlap with each other and run the risk of catastrophic damages if they should collide with one another. The precision for calculations in this format leaves absolutely no room for human error.
But the next form of a Dyson Sphere…



…solves the problem of complex overlapping orbits by having no orbit whatsoever. In the Dyson Bubble structure all the satellites are fixed in place using countermeasures built into the solar sails. While the ability to lock “statites” (Stationary Satellites) around the sun is beyond modern engineering capabilities, it cannot be ruled out as a potential candidate.
The third example still, the Dyson Shell (other than the Galactic level Dyson Sphere) is probably the least probable of all these.


The Dyson shell would encompass the entirety of the star, thereby harnessing 100% of its energy. The tricky issue with this unfortunately is that in constructing something of this magnitude, the civilization would displace all the suns light. This could prove catastrophic for any life on the surrounding planets that rely on the sun to produce energy for their survival. Hence why when a Dyson Shell is suggested in Science Fiction novels, typically the race that built it has also built a habitat within the shell.
Other suggestions have been put forth for other Dyson related constructs, including Stellar Engine refueling stations and the improbable “Dyson Net”, and I’m sure more will be put forward in the future until we have actually achieved this pinnacle of technology.
Now that we know what they are, how they work, what we’d need to build one, and some of the variations, let’s talk about the most important two questions of all. What kind of civilization would have one of these and just how would you look for one?

Looking For a Grain of Sand on a Beach


SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) has been searching the heavens above for decades now. Other than a few strange signals though, they’ve mostly come up with nothing. However, a researcher named Geoff Marcy has an answer. He thinks we’ve just been looking all wrong. We need to re-evaluate what it is we’re looking for.
He suggests we turn to the heavens and search for what is known as a blackbody. A blackbody is a hypothetical construct that absorbs all light in a given area. In essence, since a Dyson Sphere is meant to absorb 100% of a star’s energy, it would be classified as a Blackbody. One of my favorite publications, “From Quarks To Quasars” explains it best:

          "Stars gives off all sorts of things besides visible light; heat is just one of them. The Hubble Telescope and the Spitzer Space Telescope are equipped with several tools that can capture ultraviolet light, infrared, and x-rays...along with visible light (obviously). If we spotted a section of the cosmos where a Dyson Sphere was in use, we would likely see something like a blackbody object that's radiating in the far infrared around 10 microns in wavelength. A perfect blackbody is a theoretical construct that, among other things, is a perfect absorber (meaning that it absorbs all wavelengths equally and perfectly). It doesn't reflect anything. A Dyson Sphere, which is meant to absorb all the light of a star, would be (in essence) a blackbody. However, if these perfect abosrbers just kept on absorbing everything around them, they would get hotter and hotter and eventually they'd get infinitely hot. That can't happen, which is why a perfect blackbody is just a theoretical construct." 


So what kind of world would use this method of harnessing energy? Well according to Soviet Astronomer Nikolai Kardashev, a Type-II Civilization would be capable of completing such a daunting task. The problem? We’re still considered a Type-I civilization on the Kardashev scale. They don’t estimate us reaching Type-II for another thousand years (ouch…) to learn more about this very real scale Kardashev devised you can visit Wikipedia by clicking here.
I would love to see a Dyson Sphere of some kind in my lifetime, but for now I’ll settle for a successful deployment of a solar sail next year. We’ll probably be covering more about solar sails in the future so stay tuned for that! Thanks for reading everyone! Hope you had a wonderful Memorial Day!

-Ryan Sanders



To read more about any of the topics we discussed above today feel free to visit any of the links below. As always, thanks for reading, and Happy Learning all!

-       Wiki on Dyson Spheres
-       Wiki On Solar Sails
-       Wiki on blackbodies


Saturday, May 17, 2014

Mission to Europa: Life as We Thought We Knew It


We’ve talked about Europa and the search for extraterrestrial life on the ice giant here at To Infinity and…In Theory before. We’ve delved into life’s ability to thrive in some of the most hostile environments imaginable. (Missed those entries? Catch up on the four part series “Livin’ Life to the Extremophile” by following these links. Part 1: Vostok. Part 2: Europa. Part 3: Chemosynthesis. Part 4: Biodiversity.)
But when we talked about all that stuff before we didn’t talk very much about the most important thing. How exactly are we going to get underneath the huge sheet of ice surrounding Europa to the ocean of frozen mystery beneath? Scientists at several different agencies, from the big ones like NASA and the ESA to other firms like Stone Aerospace and Honeybee Robotics, are coming together to help answer that question.
The answer seems to lie in a multi-stage plan that will play out over the course of a few decades. Further testing still needs to be done to decide what will be the best approach for drilling into the ice for starters. Then the funding has to be raised in order to launch a mission of this scale. Luckily, researchers think they have an answer to that as well.
Today we’re going to talk about Jupiter and her moons, a program called JUICE, a payload delivery system called The Penetrator, cryobots, and a mission to Europa just to listen to the ice.
But first, a quick recap on why Europa is so promising in the search for life.

Sometimes You Just Have To Vent


For the longest time scientists purported that life could not exist at the depths of the ocean. The pressure was too high, it would crush anything organic. The light didn’t reach, nothing could possibly see to hunt and forage. Above all it would be far too cold. Then a mission to the outskirts of the Marianas Trench changed everyone’s tune. Not only was life discovered at the deepest depths at that time reached, but it was thriving.
Now we know that life is even capable of existing around some of the most hostile environments imaginable by using a process called Chemosynthesis. These hostile environments I’m talking about are the hydrothermal vents at the bottom of the ocean. Think of it like an underwater volcano.
As the ocean floor shifts due to tectonic activity from the way gravity affects our planet as it whirls through space, it causes buildups of pressure. This internal pressure has to be released somehow, so it vents it out to the ocean floor. Amongst this debris are little organic bits. Not stuff you and I like, but the kind of stuff microorganisms flourish on.
The same kind of thing is happening on Europa. It’s believed to have a rocky mantle and a molten iron core just like us. As it orbits around Jupiter, the stress from the gas giant’s gravitational force causes geothermal activity within the core. Just like our planet it has to be vented, hence the proposal for hydrothermal vents.
Only the surface is thought to be ice, the thickest ice in our solar system, but underneath that is believed to be a liquid ocean. If scientists are right the hydrothermal activity is what would make this possible, heating the water just enough to keep it from freezing near the mantle. How can they guess this from a few flybys and satellite snapshots?



The surface of Europa’s ice sheet is heavily scarred, and most of it isn’t from collisions with interstellar objects. Like Lake Vostok, a pocket lake within a sheet of ice in Antarctica, Europa is believed to be dotted with miniature bodies of water. The reason is because of the pattern of the scarring, there is no uniform structure to it.
It’s possible that as the moon orbits Jupiter the stress causes the ice to crack, but it wouldn’t be quite so varied and so jagged. When hydrothermal activity increases on the ice it may briefly unthaw some of the ice above the pocket lake (not entirely) and shift the ice around, causing the terrain patterns.
So now that we know what’s probably happening underneath the ice, what’s the plan for getting us to it? I’m going to ask you to try to keep your mind out of the gutter as we move on to our next section…

The Penetrator: Between the Ice Sheets


Europa had better prepare its Uranus for scientist Sanjay Vijendran’s payload delivery system because it looks like whatever method the mission chooses to drill into the planet “The Penetrator” is what’s going to be getting it there. It’s already been “drilled” through its paces, and is officially marked as ready for space travel. It’s fairly light given what it does, meaning an orbiting craft could launch several at a time, and it’s extremely durable.
So what is it and how does it work?


During testing the Penetrator was aimed at a 10 ton block of ice in order to simulate the effects of what it will be like to land (or crash really) on the surface of Europa. Weighing 44 pounds, it hit the block at 760 MPH showing a peak deceleration of 24-25,000g. For a point of reference, an ejecting fighter pilot experiences 14gs and typical soft-landing spacecraft experience 30-40gs.
What’s even more incredible is it was fully loaded with instruments and everything was just fine. All that happened was a little cosmetic damage, a few scratches in the paint. Being that it’s capable of burrowing up to 3m into the surface without the use of a drill, this could be the most useful tool in planetary exploration to date. It could deliver a vast array of scientific equipment for analysis of various factors. From seismometers to chemical labs.
The Penetrator is split into two different sections, the warm bay and the cold bay. The cold bay is for taking in samples and the warm bay houses instruments and keeps them from being damaged by the extreme temperatures on Europa (minus 200 degrees Celsius).
Its designer, Vijendran, has made note of its advantages over soft landers. Where they have to slow down, this can hit at full force, so all the space wasted from expensive instrumentation meant to decelerate a craft can be utilized by other items.
And just what might those other things be? Let’s take a look at some of the other toys possibly going along for the ride to Europa.

Lasers, Auto-Gophers, And Cryobots, Oh My!



So now that we know how they intend to get onto the surface and drop off the equipment, what exactly are they bringing? And not just that, what exactly is this equipment going to do and how does it work? That’s a very good question and I’m so glad you asked it. The answer however is sort of difficult because as of the time of this writing, even the scientists aren’t sure what to pack in their lunchbox yet.
First and foremost they’re going to need something to drill into the ice. Secondly they’re going to need something to obtain and analyze samples. Lastly the equipment needs to be extremely durable and able to withstand the tremendously frigid temperatures.
Two scientists named Victoria Siegel and Kris Zacny have two very separate approaches to this same problem.

The Cryobot


According to Siegel’s team at Stone Aerospace the ocean is where it’s at, “That’s where the big stuff is going to be happening,” she says. But in order to get down to that “big stuff” we have to be able to drill through 10 km of ice. (That’s a little over 6 miles.) There is nowhere on Earth with a sheet of ice 6 miles thick. The Antarctic Ice Sheet is the closest we have at 2.6, but we’re still talking about something over double that. And it’s an exponentially colder and harsher environment trillions of miles away.
Not to mention drilling creates problems. There’s a lot of moving parts, in order to go deeper extensions need to be added, and if something breaks it’s not like a maintenance crew can just catch an interstellar taxi to Europa to fix it. The VALKYRIE cryobots hope to solve all of those problems and give the team just what they’re shooting for.
They have been working on a device since 2011 that is capable of using meltwater (water sucked up through the jets and heated) to bore its way through the ice. Once it reaches the ocean it will launch a small submarine from its belly to get a bird’s eye view of the world beneath the ice and to collect water samples to scan for signs of life.
Listen to how ScienceNews.org describes the working of the cryobot.

“The cryobot, a tube about as long as a compact car, holds wires coiled within a sleek aluminum frame and five jets arranged in a domed head. By heating aluminum blocks within the head, the cryobot can melt ice, and then suck in the water and shoot out hot streams. To thaw the ultracold ice of Europa, the bot will need to carry some sort of onboard nuclear reactor. Siegel and colleagues are testing their device on Earth using laser light pumped down a fiber optics wire connected to the machine.”

As of now the cryobot has moved into Phase-II of its development and the underwater submersible, being developed by NASA are solid candidates for the mission to Europa. The only thing (like most ambitious missions) that could possibly hold them back is funding. Launching a piece of equipment like that is costly and time will tell if the government is willing to shell out the funds necessary to give Stone Aerospace the chance to prowl the depths of Jupiter’s moon, and the go-ahead to launch a nuclear device to the surface of a foreign and pristine world.

The Auto-Gopher


The Auto-Gopher is a wire-line rotary hammer drill. In other words, it smashes its way through the ground as it digs into it. Kris Zacny of the company Honeybee Robotics believes that this is the way to go. It’s cheaper to use a drill then a robot, not to mention this will require a significant amount less power to operate. So how does it all work?
“It’s like a fishing rod,” Zacny says, “and at the end of the fishing line, you have a drill.” I suppose that’s an apt description if you’re used to fishing with explosives. (Metaphorically speaking) The teeth that jut out on the end of the drill are made of tungsten carbide and to get it through the particularly rough spots in the ice they gave it the ability to “thump” its way through by adding in a percussive system.
It only draws about 350 watts of power all in all. That’s less than your microwave uses. The whole thing is attached to a wire and pulley system so that sections don’t need to be added or removed. And now they have funding for an even better drill. From the same ScienceNews.org article check out this excerpt.

“Now the team is working on a new and improved drill, the AMNH Deep Drill, named after its funding source, the American Museum of Natural History. This drill will shuttle rock or ice cuttings to a container inside the tube instead of creating cores that have to be pulled from the borehole. And researchers plan to pack electronics and equipment, such as a microscope and sensors, inside the tube.”

This method has several advantages. It means every foot that the device goes down will be analyzed for scientific record and the Kevlar coated wire is strong and avoids using bulky extensions that would be difficult to add and remove. They’re also doing research into carbon nano-tubes (so did we! “Nano-Tech:Big Problems, Small Answers”) in order to make the device even more lightweight, making the Auto-Gopher just as, if not more, appealing to potential backers.
In my personal opinion they should combine the underwater submersible with the drill and go for broke. But what do I know? I do know that this is all expensive, and while the president wants to give funding to space programs, there isn’t a whole lot of money to spare, (what with the bankers needing bailouts for gold Cadillac’s, Rolex’s, and private jet fuel.) So what’s the plan?

Budget “Clipper”


NASA’s got a plan for Europa exploration as well. It’s called Clipper. It’s a highly advanced, extremely durable satellite that will optimally perform 45 flybys of the ice moon at varying altitudes. It will take highly advanced pictures of the surface, scan the exact thickness of the ice (right now the thickness is just an educated guess), document radiation levels in the atmosphere and record exact temperatures on the entirety of Europa, there are a host of other possibilities this device brings to the table as well.
The problem is the $2.2 billion price tag. The Obama administration is willing to work with NASA, but only to the extent of $1 billion. Dr. Britney Schmidt who is spear-heading Clipper is thrilled the President has brought Space Exploration to the party finally but the budget is less than ideal.
Another scientist however, by the name of Christopher McKay thinks that that will be plenty enough. If the whole goal is to examine the surface of Europa and scan under the ice then he has just the plan for them. He intends to land a camera and a microphone on the surface to “listen” to the ice.
No that isn’t a joke. As the ice moves around scientists will be able to tell exactly what’s going on beneath the surface. How they are able to do this eludes me but if there’s a person who can translate it then I can get behind it. While I doubt Europa will be appearing on the next Santana album for a live duet with the guitar playing legend, this “ice noise” could bring us one step closer to missions like Spiegel’s, Schmidt’s, and Zacny’s.
This kind of exploration builds confidence and public interest, which is exactly what missions like Clipper and the Auto-Gopher are hinging on now. But while America is scrambling for the scraps, the ESA grabbed a V-8 and got juiced up for a little mission of their own.

Europe JUICE-in’ Up For Europa



While NASA is tuned into the Europa station, the European Space Agency is looking at the whole picture. All three Galilean moons are thought to contain liquid water somewhere beneath the surface. If we’re going to be in the neighborhood, why not see all the sights? The ESA is planning to send a probe called JUICE (JUpiter ICy moons Explorer) into orbit around Callisto, Europa, and Ganymede.
The goal is to study the composition of water beneath, survey the topographical features of the planets more thoroughly, investigate their potentiality to contain life as we think we know it, and many, many other awesome plans. There’s something even better, this is already in the works.
The time frame to deliver JUICE to the Jovian system is 2030 with a launch from Earth taking place as early as 2022. The prospect of this is exciting and they have plenty of time to make revisions and add other instrumentation. Russia is developing most of the components and say what you will about their foreign policy, they make some really good stuff.
With all the options open to us above and many others that could become potential candidates in the future we will certainly be seeing some kind of landing within the next twenty to forty years. Time will tell. Speaking of time, here at TI&IT we like to delve into the history of things as well as the science, after all, what are we without our past?
The question really isn’t who discovered these moons, we attribute that to astronomer Galileo, but what some may not know is while he is credited, someone may have discovered them first. Let’s take a look at the remarkable past of Jupiter’s biggest satellites.

Galileo and the Medicean Planets


The photo above that looks like the scribbling of a madman in a ward is actually the handwriting of the brilliant Galileo Galilei himself. He discovered the planets sometime around 1609-1610 while he was making improvements to his telescope. He originally named them the Medicean Stars in honor of the Medici family, but later it was discovered they were moons.
And it wasn’t much later either. In fact, it may have been earlier. A man named Simon Marius, a German astronomer, had made observations a few days prior of the same nature. In 1614 he published his paper  “Mundus Lovialis” detailing his discovery of Jupiter’s moons. You can imagine this led to some heated debates between him and Galileo.


In the end it is irrelevant who discovered it first, Marius ultimately won out the name-calling as the celestial bodies Io, Ganymede, Europa, and Callisto were the names he selected. And thankfully history was kind enough to remember him for that. Remnants of his work are scarce but he’s credited as “a clever observer” which is probably not the most sought after title in the scientific community.
But then again, what are all of us now?
Jupiter’s moons are named after Greek mythology. To be exact they are named after the lovers of Zeus. For the sake of the length of this article already we won’t go into too much about this now, but I’m sure in the future we will be talking about Europa once again.

Europa’s Cold Future


While we probably won’t find space penguins orbiting around the moons of Jupiter or Saturn we may find some sort of life. That is if we can get the funding to get off the ground and get there. From cryobots to satellites there are a number of possibilities for exploring these intriguing heavenly worlds.
But as usual, money will hold scientific progress back. While that is depressing I hope you enjoyed this article on the future of Europa. Please share this around on Facebook and Twitter, I would be eternally grateful. Thank you all for reading, and enjoy this comical pun.


-Ryan Sanders

If you want to know more about any of the topics discussed above feel free to follow any of the links below! As always, thanks for reading and Happy Learning!

-       Wiki on Europa Clipper